<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:coop="http://www.google.com/coop/namespace"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From lighters to pipes, Smule busts out Ocarinas for iPhones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.touchtip.com/iphone/from-lighters-to-pipes-smule-busts-out-ocarinas-for-iphones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.touchtip.com/iphone/from-lighters-to-pipes-smule-busts-out-ocarinas-for-iphones/</link>
	<description>The online community for iPhone tips and iPod touch hacks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 20:48:15 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: iphone app reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.touchtip.com/iphone/from-lighters-to-pipes-smule-busts-out-ocarinas-for-iphones/comment-page-1/#comment-3177</link>
		<dc:creator>iphone app reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.touchtip.com/?p=1677#comment-3177</guid>
		<description>I didnt know Smule was behind that virtual lighter app. Interesting to note how they have progressed in such a short time. What gets me about this app is that it could easily merit a much higher price tag, and I think that 1.99 may have been an even better price point (figure that if even half the people bought it they would still be even, and anything more than half is all profit). Still, they have done what many app developers dream of, solidified their reputation as quality, forward looking devs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didnt know Smule was behind that virtual lighter app. Interesting to note how they have progressed in such a short time. What gets me about this app is that it could easily merit a much higher price tag, and I think that 1.99 may have been an even better price point (figure that if even half the people bought it they would still be even, and anything more than half is all profit). Still, they have done what many app developers dream of, solidified their reputation as quality, forward looking devs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
